Periodic Table of Habits
Refrains from consuming existing media formats to maintain originality. Focuses on creating without external influences shaping direction.
Revises narratives repeatedly to achieve an effortless flow. Prioritizes making complex choices feel inevitable to listeners.
Openly shares personal doubts and biases during investigations. Balances journalistic rigor with human vulnerability.
Records real-time observations during on-site investigations. Captures ambient sounds and interactions for narrative authenticity.
Maintains professional distance while building trust with subjects. Avoids friendships that could compromise objectivity.
Writes detailed scripts that mimic natural speech patterns. Uses deliberate pauses and colloquial phrasing.
Reconstructs events minute-by-minute to verify alibis. Cross-references disparate accounts for inconsistencies.
Prioritizes factual accuracy while crafting engaging narratives. Resists sensationalism in true crime reporting.
Works closely with producers to refine narrative arcs. Incorporates team feedback during editing processes.
Tracks online discussions about ongoing investigations. Intervenes when public speculation becomes harmful.
Downplays personal achievements publicly. Uses humor to deflect praise during interviews.
Spends extended time in communities being documented. Observes daily rhythms to understand context.
Structures complex stories into digestible weekly installments. Maintains suspense through cliffhangers.
Limits interviews to promote work rather than personality. Avoids self-aggrandizement in press appearances.
Highlights nuanced details about subjects' lives. Avoids reducing people to stereotypes.
Explains reporting techniques within narratives. Discloses limitations and uncertainties.
Uses self-deprecating humor during questioning. Lowers subjects' defenses through casual rapport.
Pursues unanswered questions obsessively. Follows leads beyond surface-level explanations.
Presents evidence without explicit calls to action. Lets listeners draw their own conclusions.
Shares investigative dead-ends and mistakes. Normalizes the messy reality of reporting.
