Replace one argumentative reply with a repeatable test and a written result.
WhenWhen a testable disagreement recurs
“I once purpos'd answering the abbé, and actually began the answer; but, on consideration that my writings contained a description of experiments which anyone might repeat and verify, and if not to be verifi'd, could not be defended; or of observations offer'd as conjectures, and not delivered dogmatically, therefore not laying me under any obligation to defend them; and reflecting that a dispute between two persons, writing in different languages, might be lengthened greatly by mistranslations, and thence misconceptions of one another's meaning, much of one of the abbé's letters being founded on an error in the translation, I concluded to let my papers shift for themselves, believing it was better to spend what time I could spare from public business in making new experiments, than in disputing about those already made.”
Benjamin Franklin, Autobiography, chapter XVIII, in Frank Woodworth Pine ed. (1916); events 1750s; retrospective manuscript written 1771–1790. Read the source ↗
Why it works
He reasoned that repeatable experiments could be checked and chose new experiments over a lengthy dispute. This does not settle value disagreements.
Start tiny
Write a prediction and a safe test step in 90 seconds.
What you’ll notice
Notice whether the result can disagree with you.
When it slips
Do not test a claim that cannot be measured this way. State the limit and return to discussion.
Benjamin Franklin, Autobiography, chapter XVIII, in Frank Woodworth Pine ed. (1916); events 1750s; retrospective manuscript written 1771–1790. Read the source ↗
Mastery: Practices you develop over weeks through skill, planning and trade-offs.



